Archive for January, 2007

Memo From Buss Schmeingold’s Doctor

Date:  Tuesday, 30 January 2007

From:  Dr. _____ [Boo's Note - I have deleted the doctor's name to protect his identity]

To:  Boo Friedmann

Re:  Interesting Diagnosis

Boo,

A certain Senator came into the office yesterday.  In the interest of patient privacy, we’ll call him BUS SCHMEINGOLD.  All in a twitter he was, thinking he had some form of cancer or some such disease.  So he pulled down his pants, I looked, I palmed, he coughed …

Is it serious, Doc? he asked me as the sweat glistened above his upper lip.

Senator Feingold Schmeingold, I exclaimed, Mazel Tov, son!  You’ve grown balls!!!

I’ve never seen a Senator so happy … you can’t blame him, though.  Rarely do Democrats get that “diagnosis”. 

See you soon,

Dr. ___________

 

Well, Buss Schmeingold, glad you’re ok!  And good luck with those balls … go use ‘em, tiger!! 

31

01 2007

Bush Administration Climate Change Policy Suggestions

On February 2nd, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will release one of the most comprehensive reports on climate change in recent years.  The Bush Administration has tried to steer conclusions away from a climate treaty to reduce emissions toward a policy of using giant mirrors, reflective dust, or even reflective balloons to block or bounce sunlight to help cool the Earth.   

I sat down earlier today with Harlan Watson, Senior Climate Negotiator at the U.S. State Department and Days of Our Lives aficionado, to learn more about the Bush Administration’s policies on battling global warming.  Since I wasn’t allowed to make a video of our conversation, I’ve included a transcript below. 

Boo:  Dr. Watson, so good for you to come speak with me today.

Dr. Watson:  You wanna drink?

Just to be clear, Dr. Watson did seem a tad bit distracted.  He brought a tumbler and the entire bottle of Scotch to the table.  In the background, I could hear what sounded like a TV program playing.

Boo:  No, thank you.  So, Dr. Watson, for my readers, can you discuss a little bit about the giant mirrors the Bush Administation is advocating for inclusion in the IPCC report?

Dr. Watson:  Well, you know how when you’re hanging out in your swimming pool -

Boo:  I don’t have a swimming pool -

Dr. Watson:  Well, you know how when normal kids are hanging out by their swimming pools and they get a magnifying glass and burn ants with it?

Boo:  … sorta …

Dr. Watson:  That’s what we wanna do, but in reverse. 

Boo:  Just reflect the sunlight.

Dr. Watson:  Yup.

Dr. Watson contemplated his glass of scotch with a winced eye and flare of the nostril.  Seeming worlds away, his sudden sense of melodrama made me think he might actually take climate change seriously. 

Boo:  OK … what other ideas are currently being contemplated by the Bush Administration?

Dr. Watson:  Can Iran be the ants by the swimming pool?

Boo’s Inner Dialogue:  Oh G-d, he actually thought that was funny.  Jesus Christ, it’s fucking freezing … you could cut glass with my nipples!

Boo:  Dr. Watson, please.  What about emission limits?  It doesn’t really appear as the administration is serious about focusing on carbon dioxide emissions, which credible scientists agree are causing a major problem with our climate. 

Dr. Watson:  We have plenty of ideas.

Boo:  Like what?

Dr. Watson:  You want me to name them now?

Boo:  Please.

Dr. Watson:  Like just list a a bunch of things we’re doing …

Boo:  That’s why we’re here.

Dr. Watson:  We’re here because my EX secretary is too stupid to … never mind.  Well, we’re going to fund huge dehumidifiers to be placed in every city in the U.S.

He looked at me like he said something really profound.  Did I miss something?  Am I through the looking glass?  What the hell is going on? 

Without excusing himself, he walked into another room.  I quickly partook of the scotch because it was obvious that sobriety was getting me nowhere … fast.  When he came back in, he was mumbling something vehemently under his breath.

Boo:  What was that, Dr. Watson?

Dr. Watson:  (under his breath) If Stefano Dimera has fucked with Patch one more time, I swear to G-d.

Boo:  What?

Dr. Watson:  Are you still here?

Boo’s Inner Dialogue:  No, this is one of your fucking mirrors reflecting my image in the room shithead. 

Boo:  Explain to me what the dehumidifiers would do?

He glanced at me with eyes you reserve for the “special” cashier who takes 20 minutes to ring your bubblegum, paper towels and a box of condoms.  I should have started smoking weed again before coming to this interview. 

Dr. Watson:  It’s not the heat … it’s the humidity that’ll kill us. 

Boo’s Inner Dialogue:  Dear Stephen Hawking, please move up the Doomsday Clock one more minute …

I don’t care what you say, I’m not following that up. 

Boo:  And what else?

Dr. Watson:  It’s pretty comprehensive, really.  We’ll incorporate giant ice tea reservoirs throughout the country.  Who the hell doesn’t want a tall glass of tea on a hot day?

Boo’s Inner Dialogue:  Will there be scotch in it?

Dr. Watson:  And we’ll offer a tax credit on all fan purchases.  Hand fans AND electric fans.  It provides an even playing field for families.

Boo’s Inner Dialogue:  ATTICA!  ATTICA!  ATTICA!

Dr. Watson:  I’d like to see a revolutionary new approach to the way we live in the world.  Like cars run on nuclear energy.  Houses cooled with clean burning coal.  The possiblities are endless. 

He emptied his third glass, sat back in his chair, and studied me like I kidnapped the Lindbergh baby.  That was it.  I tried to graciously excuse myself, which didn’t work because I might have exclaimed I HEARD THERE ARE DEHUMIDIFIERS IN HELL ASSHOLE on my way down the hall.  Don’t worry, I doubt he heard me.  He was already back to the TV, contemplating the sands through the hourglass … so are the days of our lives.  The really fucking hot days this administration could give a crap about …

Outside Voice with Chey Bell & Citizenboo

Outside voice logo         chey bell

 

 

Every Wednesday from 1 – 3 PST, you can tune into www.nowinla.com to check out Chey Bell and myself for The Outside Voice

This week, the topic is What influence does the media have in influencing voter opinions?  Are they informing us, or are they conditioning us?

Check out Chey’s thoughts below and get ready for the show! 

During the show, you can contribute to the live chat and be apart of the discussion … now what news program allows you to do THAT?? 

29

01 2007

Turn Off The Freakin’ TV ~ by Chey Bell, Host of Outside Voice

Soon after Hilary Clinton announced that she was forming a presidential exploratory committee, the media doer’s are hard at work drumming up convoluted media rhetoric. What choices do constitutes really have when pulverized with questions like “Are we ready for a Women or an African American President?” When most people seem to be motivated by the possibility of a brighter future, they now have to entertain a thought imposed on us by the invisible media people.
 

When media and advertising are some of the biggest influences on the methods of viewing and interpretation the world around us, I’m forced to consider the following: What is the media’s impact on shaping the decisions of voters?; Does it in fact play a role in why so many African American men are illegally obtained, searched and violated?; Does the media have anything to do with why my uncle June Bug can’t get a job?; What is the media’s role in little ole white women grabbing their purse when they see a black man walking in their direction?; Is there a relationship between a person who wears locks and the assumption that they must surely be the biggest weed smokers walking the planet?; Why does the media only identify beauty with blonde hair, blue-eyed size two types?; Can we separate these stereotypes as only relating to specific aspects of life, or do these same templates of media manipulation expand to the political arena?
 

By watching television, news media outlets are manufacturing our consent and shaping our lives.  Advertising has the ability to tell us what we need, what we should have, how we should dress and what we should listen to.  While I’m not suggesting that all TV is bad, I’m encouraging independent self thought.
 

Turn off the freakin TV once and a while, sit and meditate and perhaps quietly examine how YOU feel about whatever it is that YOU feel.  Question authority, trust that if something doesn’t feel right, be free to explore that.  Maybe have a shot of brandy and examine some more.  Too often we hear people say’ “Well it was on TV, it must be true”.  A Television can do many things, but the last time I poured a glass of water on it, it produced some sparks and a lot of smoke, it did not however; produce wine

For some people the thought of a women becoming the president of the United States is scary and dangerous, and the thought of a black man even thinking about the job is funny.  Through the course of the upcoming Presidential campaign, we can count on the media focusing on a lot of very trivial and unimportant rhetoric: Is Hilary Clinton going to get her hair done; will Bill be working in the Oval Office with the interns; Will Osama hire Roscoe’s Chicken and Waffles to cater Sunday dinners in the White House; simply put; “A Bunch of dumb Shit.” 
 

Don’t become alarmed or let this distract you from the power you have to make your own decision.

29

01 2007

Translation Generator

As you know, I love to focus on the language and rhetoric of the political theatre with this blog.  Some of my Capital Hill insiders have provided me with this dictionary excerpt that I thought blew the lid off some of the statements made by our leaders in recent weeks.  Please keep in mind, the information provided below fell into my hands through an anonymous source, and – for the record – I have nothing to do with its content.

So I offer to you what I’d like to call a Translation Generator.  And as we lead with this into the weekend, please, if you have some insider friends with samples of this dictionary in their possession, I’d love for you to add to it. 

Democrat i.e., Democrat Majority

Usage: Use in replace of the proper term “Democratic” without looking like too much of an asshole for losing the Majority.   The perk of this phrase stems from the fact that when someone, usually more intelligent than you, calls you out for using it, you Scooter Libby out of it by simply saying, “Oops!  I totally forgot the ‘ic’ at the end.  Human error … my bad!”

Family Values Twins

Usage: As a key phrase required during all Republican campaigns and various Senate speeches, this refers to the 1950s view of how a family should look.  It is the Government rearing its ugly head in your bedroom without explicitly having to talk about icky sexual positions (leave that to the Evangelicals).  Family values, as with “sanctity of marriage”, signifies how much Republicans hate gay people, but don’t have the balls to go Third Reich on their asses … yet.

Family Values is incredibly important to conservative voters, unless you’re the Cheney’s. 

The Far Left weather underground

Usage:  A favorite of Cultural Warrior, Bill “Pass My Nitroglycerin Before I Explode” O’Reilly, the “Far Left” signifies everyone who disagrees with his extreme, right-wing views.  Like washing your opponent in the cool waters of a Satanic Plague, calling someone “far left” demonizes them and gives you the upper hand without ever having to make an intelligent point. 

Hurricane Katrina bush holding black child

Usage: Better just to not mention this one … It is, however, of utmost importance to give the appearance of loving black people.  Hug a black baby – if it’s a poor, black baby, even better.

 

Hurts Small Business

Usage: Especially combined with the term “minimum wage hike”, the catchphrase sidetracks listeners to the fact that you believe business is more important than people, especially families, and especially families who work full-time jobs and still live beneath the poverty line.  That’s what tax breaks are for, people! 

If you want to look back, that’s fine, but I’m trying to look forward. [Sen. John McCain, Armed Services Committee, 24 January 2007]

Usage: (a). In cases of possible accountability (b). When one’s candidacy for the president of the United States is contingent upon a continuing war in the Middle East.  (c). To avoid looking like a pussy in front of Senator Levin.

In order to deflect culpability, use this clause to give the impression that you mean business, want to problem solve, and anticipate using the same fucking assholes in your campaign that got the U.S. into the Iraq War in the first place.  It’s the proverbial wave of the shiny keys to sidetrack anyone who presumes to want real answers. 

[Note when using this phrase: Choose what history is worth remembering wisely (i.e., Sadam gassed his own people = good use of history; Sadam gassed his people in 1988 = too specific use of history).]

“I’m the Decision Maker” [President Bush during a press conference, 25 January 2007]

bush being himself

Usage: Cross-referenced with “I’m the Decider” (a term affectionately retired because it connoted “I’m a retard”, a leader declares that he/she is the Decision Maker when faced with Congressional oversight.  When engaging in bullshit political activity that borders on treason, i.e., the Iraq War, making a regal proclamation that undercuts the very essence of our democracy and any sense of checks and balances, shocks the other side so utterly that by the time they have a chance to ask, “the hell?!?”, you’ll already be knocking the proverbial ball out of the park. 

Impeachment would hurt the country 

Usage: See also – “If you want to look back, that’s fine, but I’m trying to look forward“.  When faced with paying for how you fucked up the country,  deflect admonishment to the other side of the aisle using a blame tactic even a Jewish mother wouldn’t use.  Since only the Republicans are allowed to impeach for promiscuity, impeachment for lying about getting into a war that has cost the lives of 3,000 American servicemen and women cannot be considered.  This is the political version of I’m rubber, and you’re glue.  What you say bounces off me and sticks to you, though this version is more … dickish.

Iraq War and 9/11 

Usage:  The usage of this tagline is obvious, and in fact, the meaning doesn’t matter.  Just keep repeating it over and over and over and over …

Is the country ready for a …

Usage: When journalists talk about Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, in order to avoid doing any real journalism such as covering their voting record, vision for the future, or policy considerations, keep conditioning the public with this question in order to make them ask “hey … is the country ready for a black president??  After all, we did elect retarded cowboy …”

Pro-Life

Usage: The term “pro-life” is an excellent way to convince people that you are really more than just pro-birth.  Since we do not care what happens after the actual birth of a child, and can’t wait to put those little bastards in the electric chair Texas style as soon as we can, we use a benign and friendly term that signifies otherwise.

What would the terrorists think? tony snow

Usage:  A favorite phrase of White House Press Secretary and Patron Saint of the Rhetorical Run-Around, Tony Snow, use this question to counteract the seemingly pragmatic solution offered to a total cluster fuck.  An example would read as follows:

Journalist: How does the White House respond to the charge that our soldiers are currently just policing a Civil War, and sending more troops is not only not a new strategy, but it would actually exacerbate the situation?

Saint Tony: Well, what we have to think about is what would the terrorists think if we just leave now?

Like glaring a penetrating light on something that sounds good but is total tauri excretio, asking how your sworn enemy might react to common sense makes common sense sound like extremism.  Thus, the overall effectiveness of the tauri excretio you’re spouting increases ten-fold.

 

27

01 2007

Chuck Hagel on the Iraq Resolution – 24 Jan 2007

I don’t care why Senator Hagel made this speech, just as I don’t care that the only reason President Reagan signed and promoted ratification of the Genocide Convention was because of his unbelievable blunder at Bitburg Cemetary.

The importance here lies in the fact it was said. That Senator Hagel capitulated with honest reasoning and insightful articulation what lies at stake for the country, should be commended.

25

01 2007

Awesomeness

First, an apology:

As you know, last night was the SOTU, and I got a little carried away.  We were invited to a very swank party, and even though I can’t divulge too much information, let me suggest that anyone mentioning tequila body shots to Senator Biden better watch out.  And just for the record, Joe said he could handle it.  I mean, I wasn’t the one who talked you into doing Irish Car Bombs on the off chance that 9/11 wasn’t explicitly said in the speech!  {That was Kennedy!}  So Joe, if you’re reading this: TAKE SOME ASPIRIN AND SHUT UP ABOUT IT! 

Anywho …

I did want to post one of the funniest pictures from last night:

Hannity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the interest of full disclosure, let me just admit how I love Fox News Polls.  They’re so … so … just so dang SCIENTIFIC.  Needless to say, if your news station’s opinion polls are diametrically opposed to all evidence to the contrary, STICK WITH THAT STATION.  Let that be your beacon of light, and bless you as you wish “Merry Christmas” to all who enter Wal-Mart.

And who here thinks Hannity stuffs his jowls with cotton just to intimidate Colmes?  And when did they bring back Colmes cryogenically?  It’s a miracle, I tell you.

So now, dear readers, I must care for my hangover.  I only have a few minutes left before Kerry is going to knock on my door again demanding me to give him his copy of Xanadu back.  Damn him … I LOVE that movie!

25

01 2007

Chronicles of People Missing the Point – SOTU Edition

Every so often, someone in the public eye spouts something so completely off base that it borders on the ridiculous.  I respectfully chronicle those vacations of mental pragmatism in a segment I like to call Chronicles of People Missing the Point.

First, in an effort to extend my gratitude at Bush’s gracious remarks to Speaker Pelosi, I quote him below.  Unlike some, I welcome even the appearance of his sincerity, since all consideration and respect have been lacking of late in the political arena:   

Thank you very much. Tonight, I have a high privilege and distinct honor of my own — as the first President to begin the State of the Union message with these words: Madam Speaker.

In his day, the late Congressman Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., from Baltimore, Maryland, saw Presidents Roosevelt and Truman at this rostrum. But nothing could compare with the sight of his only daughter, Nancy, presiding tonight as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Congratulations.

Notice, however, that I refer to Bush as just Bush – not Mr. President, not President Bush, not even George Bush.  If he would truly like to receive the ceremonial respect of his post, he might stop using the term “Democrat Congress” within the chambers, knowing that it is an under-handed smear aimed at the other side of the aisle.  How about this – you use language that is not connotatively misleading and negetive, and we won’t mention how your tail, tucked firmly between your legs, made your suit fit awkwardly. 

But now onto the matters at hand.  Yes, earmarks are awful, unless you’re Ted Stevens (R-AK).  I actually agree with what Bush said about them:

Next, there is the matter of earmarks. These special interest items are often slipped into bills at the last hour — when not even C-SPAN is watching. In 2005 alone, the number of earmarks grew to over 13,000 and totaled nearly $18 billion. Even worse, over 90 percent of earmarks never make it to the floor of the House and Senate — they are dropped into Committee reports that are not even part of the bill that arrives on my desk. You did not vote them into law. I did not sign them into law. Yet they are treated as if they have the force of law. The time has come to end this practice. So let us work together to reform the budget process … expose every earmark to the light of day and to a vote in Congress … and cut the number and cost of earmarks at least in half by the end of this session.

Yes, earmarks cost a lot of money.  It is a Congressional problem for both Democrats and Republicans; however, I would say that Bush’s extensive use of Signing Statements costs more than money – it undercuts how our democracy is supposed to work.  Using Signing Statements more than 750 times to directly interpret the intent and constitutionality of a law threatens the delicate balance of our government.  And thus, he hit on an idea but completely missed the point.

The real lapse in policy resembling anything even orbiting this realm of reality came with this part of the speech about Health Insurance:

Tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax deduction for health insurance that will be like the standard tax deduction for dependents. Families with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this reform, more than 100 million men, women, and children who are now covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit from lower tax bills.

At the same time, this reform will level the playing field [italics are mine] for those who do not get health insurance through their job. For Americans who now purchase health insurance on their own, my proposal would mean a substantial tax savings — $4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a year. And for the millions of other Americans who have no health insurance at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a vital and necessary step to making health care affordable for more Americans.

This is right up there with the notion of trickle down economics as policy during the Reagan era.  Nothing exacerbated economic inequality like Reaganomics, and nothing makes less sense than giving a tax cut to people who can’t afford health insurance in the first place.  The working poor do not need a check from the Government in the spring to offset medical bills paid from the rest of the year – they need health insurance. 

This is not a difficult concept.  Everyone has a right to healthcare – not a privilage, a right.  May I go so far as to add, DUH!

Again, Bush hitting on an idea, but missing the point.  And thus, George W. Bush is hereby inducted into the CHRONICLES OF PEOPLE MISSING THE POINT. 

Congratulations.  Your certificate is in the mail.